Skip to content
Healthcare feedback

Friends and Family Test Analysis — Turn Patient Comments into Service Improvements

FFT responses can show where people feel well supported and where the service journey needs attention. The comments help explain the experience behind the headline measure.

By ReviewsBlender · Published

Use the current FFT question and guidance

NHS England describes the Friends and Family Test as a way for people using NHS services to give feedback on their overall experience. The current national guidance should determine how a provider implements and reports the FFT.

Keep response counts, collection methods, service scope and reporting periods clear. A change in collection can change who responds. The proportion giving a positive answer, the response rate and the number of comments mentioning a theme are different measures. See the NHS sources below for the authoritative requirements.

Analyse comments around the patient journey

ThemeWhat comments may describeAppropriate follow-up
AccessBooking and appointment availabilityReview access routes and demand/capacity information
WaitingTime before or during an appointmentCheck relevant operational measures
CommunicationClarity, expectations and follow-up informationReview patient-facing messages and handovers
Respect and supportFeeling listened to and treated consideratelyDiscuss recurring experience themes through appropriate governance
EnvironmentWayfinding, comfort and accessibilityCheck the physical journey and existing audits

These are experience categories, not clinical assessments. A comment about an outcome or safety concern must follow the provider’s established clinical, complaints or safeguarding route.

Protect patient confidentiality

Agree the purpose, data fields, access, transfer arrangements and retention before sharing feedback with an external supplier. Minimise identifiable information and consider whether free-text details can identify a patient or staff member even after names are removed.

Publish aggregate learning without disclosing individual care details. Responding publicly to a review should not confirm an individual’s treatment or expose private information. The provider’s information-governance and professional requirements remain central to the work. No general statement on this page establishes compliance for a particular implementation.

Close the feedback loop

A useful feedback meeting asks what the concern is, what evidence supports it, who will investigate and how the service will communicate what changed. Retain positive themes too: patients may value behaviours that are worth protecting during a redesign.

The medical-centre engagement describes patient-experience work involving FFT feedback. Its published outcomes are specific to that engagement, not targets guaranteed for other practices.

Agree a suitable bespoke analysis

ReviewsBlender’s service material includes bespoke work with confidential healthcare feedback. Establish suitability and handling requirements before any patient information is transferred. An initial discussion can use anonymised examples and a description of the decision the provider needs to make.

The analysis can support service-improvement priorities. It does not replace national submission requirements, clinical review or a formal complaints process.

Use contact@reviewsblender.com to discuss scope without including patient-identifiable details in the initial enquiry.

Frequently asked questions

Does analysing FFT comments replace NHS reporting?

No. Providers should follow current NHS England implementation and submission guidance. Thematic analysis adds context for improvement work.

Can FFT results be compared directly between practices?

Check differences in collection, services, periods and respondent mix first. A simple comparison of percentages can obscure those differences.

Sources and further reading

External product and policy information checked on 1 November 2026. Product descriptions are vendor documentation; recommendations and interpretations are ReviewsBlender’s. Linked policies take precedence if they change.

Find out what your reviews are telling you

ReviewsBlender produces a human-validated intelligence report for $99 one-off, delivered within 24–72 hours. Ongoing monitoring costs $59/month and delivers weekly intelligence reports with review response suggestions. Coverage is checked for your business before analysis begins.

No setup fees. Cancel monthly monitoring any time. At least 3 actionable insights in your report, or a refund.